On 11 November 2013 08:22, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it'd make sense to use a global 'struct seq' object instead of a > manually constructed sequence number. Most notably that would allow > ofproto_wait() to avoid a race trying to wake up on any change.
Thanks, I'll look into 'struct seq'. This was mentioned before, but I hadn't registered what it was used for. > I think that deleting the 'change_seq' member from 'struct netdev_class' > leaves no instructions in that file for how netdev class implementations > should report changes. I think that we should add a comment to explain > that, probably as part of the top level comment on struct netdev_class. Sure, I can add some documentation about this. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
