On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:01:11PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:51:39AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 04:44:17PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 08:58:49AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:24:29PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:46:42PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > > > The aim of this patch is to support provide infrastructure for
> > > > > > verification
> > > > > > of VLAN actions after an mpls_push action for OpenFlow1.3. This
> > > > > > supplements
> > > > > > existing support for verifying these actions for pre-OpenFlow1.3.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In OpenFlow1.1 and 1.2 MPLS tags are pushed after any VLAN tags that
> > > > > > immediately follow the ethernet header. This is pre-OpenFlow1.3 tag
> > > > > > ordering. Open vSwitch also uses this ordering when supporting MPLS
> > > > > > actions via Nicira extensions to OpenFlow1.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When using pre-OpenFlow1.3 tag ordering an MPLS push action does not
> > > > > > affect the VLANs of a packet. If VLAN tags are present immediately
> > > > > > after
> > > > > > the ethernet header then they remain present there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In of OpenFlow1.3+ MPLS LSEs are pushed before any VLAN tags that
> > > > > > immediately follow the ethernet header. This is OpenFlow1.3+ tag
> > > > > > ordering.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When using OpenFlow1.3+ tag ordering an MPLS push action affects the
> > > > > > VLANs of a packet as any VLAN tags previously present after the
> > > > > > ethernet
> > > > > > header are moved to be immediately after the newly pushed MPLS LSE.
> > > > > > Thus
> > > > > > for the purpose of action consistency checking a packet may be
> > > > > > changed
> > > > > > from a VLAN packet to a non-VLAN packet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In this way the effective value of the VLAN TCI of a packet may
> > > > > > differ
> > > > > > after an MPLS push depending on the OpenFlow version in use.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch does not enable the logic described above.
> > > > > > Rather it is disabled in ofpacts_check__(). It should
> > > > > > be enabled when support for OpenFlow1.3+ tag order is added
> > > > > > and enabled.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au>
> > > > >
> > > > > As far as I can tell this doesn't make sense, because where the MPLS
> > > > > tag goes is a property of the action that we know at the time we parse
> > > > > the push_mpls action. So why isn't this patch just the following?
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/lib/ofp-actions.c b/lib/ofp-actions.c
> > > > > index a02f842..f444374 100644
> > > > > --- a/lib/ofp-actions.c
> > > > > +++ b/lib/ofp-actions.c
> > > > > @@ -2071,6 +2071,9 @@ ofpact_check__(enum ofputil_protocol
> > > > > *usable_protocols, struct ofpact *a,
> > > > > * Thus nothing can be assumed about the network protocol.
> > > > > * Temporarily mark that we have no nw_proto. */
> > > > > flow->nw_proto = 0;
> > > > > + if (ofpact_get_PUSH_MPLS(a)->position ==
> > > > > OFPACT_MPLS_BEFORE_VLAN) {
> > > > > + flow->vlan_tci = 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > return 0;
> > > >
> > > > That was more or less what I originally tried. However I believe that
> > > > it
> > > > doesn't work because ofpact_get_PUSH_MPLS(a)->position may not have been
> > > > set at the time that ofpact_check__ is called. In particular this
> > > > occurs
> > > > when it is called indirectly from parse_ofp_str__.
> > > >
> > > > Moreover, when ofpact_check__ is called indirectly from parse_ofp_str__
> > > > it
> > > > is used to check actions when a one of number of protocols may be used,
> > > > that is multiple bits of *usable_protocols. If we could rely on
> > > > ofpact_get_PUSH_MPLS(a)->position then I believe that implies that if
> > > > it is
> > > > set to OFPACT_MPLS_BEFORE_VLAN all pre-OpenFlow1.3 bits of
> > > > *usable_protocols need to be cleared. Otherwise all OpenFlow1.3+ bits
> > > > would need to be cleared.
> > >
> > > I think this might be a mistake in how we define the syntax that
> > > parse_ofp_str__() parses. If I write "actions=push_mpls" on an
> > > ovs-ofctl command line, then I want that to have some specific
> > > meaning. I don't want it to mean "do one thing if you happen to
> > > negotiate OpenFlow 1.2 or some other thing if you happen to negotiate
> > > OpenFlow 1.3", because that's totally unusable and broken from a user
> > > perspective.
> >
> > To clarify, that is exactly what this series was trying to do.
> >
> > I think there is some precedence in the handling of actions
> > that set_vlans. Some OF versions implicitly push a tag, some don't.
>
> Maybe that is worth fixing too.
>
> > But I do agree that the behaviour you describe above would
> > be very confusing for users.
> >
> > > So if that the issue then I think we should change the
> > > syntax. One way would be to have "push_mpls" default to the 1.3
> > > behavior (which seems generally saner) and allow the user to specify
> > > an option to get the 1.2 behavior.
> >
> > Sure, I think I am happy with that idea.
> >
> > By an option do you mean a different action name, for example append_mpls,
> > or push_mpls_after_vlan?
>
> I was thinking of something like a push_mpls version of the
> keyword-based fin_timeout syntax. One option would be eth_type,
> defaulting to ETH_TYPE_MPLS. Another option would be position, with
> after_vlan or before_vlan as allowed values, and probably after_vlan
> as the default.
>
> With this approach, any flow with a push_mpls could be used only with
> pre-OF1.3 or OF1.3+, depending on the "position" value. One wrinkle
> that might be nice, if it isn't too nasty to implement, would be to
> have a third value "no_vlan" as the default. With no_vlan, we reject
> the flow at check time if a VLAN is present; if no VLAN is present,
> then push_mpls has the same behavior regardless of OpenFlow version.
>From an ovs-ofctl point of view I think that makes a lot of sense and I
think it should be clean enough to implement. My initial reaction is that
using a position argument would be good and I don't see any particular
problem with a no_vlan option. But I'll give some thought to an eth_type
argument.
I would like to clarify how you would like push_mpls to work in the case
where flows are received from a controller. It seems to me that the
behaviour should depend on the OpenFlow version used by the connection with
the controller as we can't change the action to accommodate an extra
argument. I think this is also easy enough to implement: actually I am
pretty sure think the series currently does that and that the difficulty
that this patch tried to address is only on the ovs-ofctl side. Regardless,
I wanted to check that is the behaviour that you would like.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
