On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:58:13PM -0800, Alex Wang wrote:
> + if (get_detach()) {
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + error = unixctl_server_create(NULL, &unixctl);
> > + if (error) {
> > + ovs_fatal(error, "failed to create unixctl server");
> > + }
> > +
> > + unixctl_command_register("exit", "", 0, 0,
> > + ovsdb_client_exit, &exiting);
> > + unixctl_command_register("ovsdb-client/block", "", 0, 0,
> > + ovsdb_client_block, &blocked);
> > + unixctl_command_register("ovsdb-client/unblock", "", 0, 0,
> > + ovsdb_client_unblock, &blocked);
> > + } else {
> > + unixctl = NULL;
> > }
> >
>
>
> 1. Should we also check get_pidfile here? Since otherwise, we won't have a
> target.
I admit that it is less convenient to control a process that lacks a
pidfile, but it is still possible if you specify the full path to the
unixctl socket.
> 2. In order to monitor all table, I really need to maximize the terminal
> screen and minimize the font,
> since there are so many columns in a row. Seems to me that I cannot
> specify columns when
> 'monitor ALL', because there is hardly any column shared by all tables.
> Are these the intended
> behavior.
I guess that, if you don't really want to monitor everything in all
the tables, you should specify exactly what you want to monitor.
Thanks,
Ben.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
