On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 01:19:39PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 02:50:17PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > It should be an administrator task to bring up devices as they
> > are configured properly.
> > 
> > Currently, Fedora is deleting the bridges when the interface is
> > brought down. Therefore, there is no bridge on the next boot and
> > the initscripts can apply the networking configuration properly
> > for a new bridge.
> > 
> > However, if the system didn't execute ifdown for some reason, the
> > bridge is left in the ovsdb and since internal ports are brought
> > up by default, there is no way for initscripts to known if the
> > adminitrator has configured it or not already.
> > 
> > This patch partially reverts the commit
> > bef071a5fdf8e2dd87677b04b3cf7a8f5094edcb
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner <f...@redhat.com>
> 
> I think you're right, that this is correct, but let's put the NEWS
> item at the top and give a little more explanation, something like
> this:
> 
>    - Internal ports are no longer brought up by default, because it should be
>      an administrator task to bring up devices as they are configured 
> properly.
> 
> This is almost certain to break some people's setups, but I guess it's
> better than what we do now.
> 
> Please give a title when referring to a commit in a log message, e.g.:
> 
>      This patch partially reverts the commit
>     bef071a5fdf8e2dd87677b04b3cf7a8f5094edcb (bridge: Always "up" internal
>     devices.).
> 
> Finally, I would have just fixed all of the above and pushed it,
> except that it also breaks half a dozen tests in the testsuite.
> Please fix those and submit a v3.

Sure, I will fix the patch with your suggestions and post a v3.

Thank for reviewing it.
fbl
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to