On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:19:33PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > Some concern has been raised by Ben Pfaff that atomic_uint64_t may not > be portable. In particular on 32bit platforms that do not have atomic > 64bit integers. > > This series removes the users of atomic_uint64_t. > It then removes atomic_uint64_t and atomic_int64_t themselves.
Both applied. Thank you! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
