Ah.

I'll mark this as "deferred" in patchwork, then, and let Pravin or Jesse
resurrect it if they think it's worthwhile.

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 01:55:38PM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Pravin,
> 
> If we're not really expecting distcleancheck to work as a separate target
> from its call in distclean, then this is not worth looking at. It is only a
> problem when used separate from distclean.
> 
> 
> On 28 May 2014 03:12, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I don't know anything about these files and it's in the datapath
> > directory so I'll leave it to Pravin and Jesse.
> >
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 01:47:00PM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote:
> > > This was causing failures in 'make distcleancheck'.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  datapath/linux/Makefile.main.in |    3 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/datapath/linux/Makefile.main.in b/datapath/linux/
> > Makefile.main.in
> > > index 88f144c..7d18253 100644
> > > --- a/datapath/linux/Makefile.main.in
> > > +++ b/datapath/linux/Makefile.main.in
> > > @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ check: all
> > >  installcheck:
> > >  mostlyclean:
> > >  clean:
> > > -     rm -f *.o *.ko *.mod.* Module.symvers *.cmd kcompat.h.new
> > > +     rm -f *.o *.ko *.mod.* Module.symvers .*.cmd kcompat.h.new \
> > > +             modules.order .tmp_versions/openvswitch.mod
> > >       for d in $(build_links); do if test -h $$d; then rm $$d; fi; done
> > >  distclean: clean
> > >       rm -f kcompat.h
> > > --
> > > 1.7.10.4
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dev mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to