Yes it will work. I'll do check-all on transaction failure. I'll also combine this commit with the previous one for clarity.
Thanks, Alex Wang, On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:04:30PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: > > This commit adds logic that marks the 'struct iface's when their > > status need to be updated but the current status update transaction > > fails. So, the main thread can re-try the update in the next run. > > > > Bug #1256577 > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> > > Now that I see it here, I am not a fan of putting all of the ifaces on > a list. It seems error-prone. I do not think that database > transactions should fail often, and so I would prefer to just run the > database refreshes on every port if the transaction fails. Does that > work OK? >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
