On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:58:26PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > 'netflow_count' and the existence of actual netflow objects is not > tightly synchronized, so we can use the relaxed atomic_count for it. > > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com>
... > -/* Returns true if there exist any netflow objects, false otherwise. */ > +/* Returns true if there exist any netflow objects, false otherwise. > + * Callers can cope with transient false positives, i.e., there is no tight > + * synchronization with the count and the actual existence of netflow > objects. > + */ I think I'd be more inclined to say that callers "must" cope with false positives. Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
