On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:00:08PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote: >> The system defined ICMPv6 header doesn't have sparse annotation, >> so this adds a definition so that endianness can be checked. >> >> Reported-by: Alex Wang <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <[email protected]> > > In some cases we've avoided warnings on system types by replacing that > type in a header in include/sparse. Did you consider that approach > here?
I thought about it but didn't go that direction since I think that we might want to add more members similar to what was done for ICMP for IPv4 (although it isn't actually needed yet). But it could go either way. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
