We previously counted flows that have been installed during the current
dump as duplicates, rather than recognising them as new flows. This
patch separates the counters out for these two cases.
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com>
---
v5-v6: No change.
v4: Initial post.
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
index 616d4a1..c9dabc2 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@
VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(ofproto_dpif_upcall);
-COVERAGE_DEFINE(upcall_duplicate_flow);
+COVERAGE_DEFINE(dumped_duplicate_flow);
+COVERAGE_DEFINE(dumped_new_flow);
COVERAGE_DEFINE(revalidate_missed_dp_flow);
/* A thread that reads upcalls from dpif, forwards each upcall's packet,
@@ -1548,15 +1549,19 @@ revalidate(struct revalidator *revalidator)
/* We couldn't acquire the ukey. This means that
* another revalidator is processing this flow
* concurrently, so don't bother processing it. */
- COVERAGE_INC(upcall_duplicate_flow);
+ COVERAGE_INC(dumped_duplicate_flow);
continue;
}
already_dumped = ukey->dump_seq == dump_seq;
if (already_dumped) {
- /* The flow has already been dumped and handled by another
- * revalidator during this flow dump operation. Skip it. */
- COVERAGE_INC(upcall_duplicate_flow);
+ /* The flow has already been handled during this flow dump
+ * operation. Skip it. */
+ if (ukey->xcache) {
+ COVERAGE_INC(dumped_duplicate_flow);
+ } else {
+ COVERAGE_INC(dumped_new_flow);
+ }
ovs_mutex_unlock(&ukey->mutex);
continue;
}
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
