On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Pravin B Shelar <[email protected]> wrote:
> handle offload code is replicated for different tunneling protocols
> define compat function to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <[email protected]>
I got some compiler errors with this patch (on 3.13):
CC [M] /home/jesse/openvswitch/datapath/linux/vxlan.o
/home/jesse/openvswitch/datapath/linux/ip_tunnels_core.c: In function
‘ovs_iptunnel_handle_offloads’:
/home/jesse/openvswitch/datapath/linux/ip_tunnels_core.c:155:3: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘OVS_GSO_CB’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
OVS_GSO_CB(skb)->fix_segment = fix_segment;
^
/home/jesse/openvswitch/datapath/linux/ip_tunnels_core.c:155:18:
error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘int’)
OVS_GSO_CB(skb)->fix_segment = fix_segment;
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/ip_tunnels_core.c
> b/datapath/linux/compat/ip_tunnels_core.c
> index e71ba4e..7606ad6 100644
> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/ip_tunnels_core.c
> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/ip_tunnels_core.c
> +struct sk_buff *ovs_iptunnel_handle_offloads(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + bool csum_help,
> + void (*fix_segment)(struct
> sk_buff *))
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (skb_is_encapsulated(skb)) {
> + err = -ENOSYS;
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + /* XXX: synchronize inner header for compat and non compat code so
> that
> + * we can do it here.
> + */
> +
> + /* skb_reset_inner_headers(skb); */
What is the issue with resetting the inner headers here?
> + /* OVS compat code does not maintain encapsulation bit.
> + * skb->encapsulation = 1; */
> +
> + if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
> + err = skb_unclone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (unlikely(err))
> + goto error;
Is it necessary to unclone here? This looks like a new addition.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
