Hi Ben,

Please find attached the updated patch for eviction feature, rebased with the 
latest ovs-master as on 02 Jan 2015.

This patch has correct code indentation. Kindly review it and provide your 
comments/inputs.

Thanks and Regards,
Saloni Jain
 Tata Consultancy Services
 Mailto: [email protected]
 Website: http://www.tcs.com
 ____________________________________________
 Experience certainty.  IT Services
                        Business Solutions
                        Consulting
 ____________________________________________

-----Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: -----
To: Saloni Jain <[email protected]>
From: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
Date: 12/31/2014 10:41PM
Cc: [email protected], Deepankar Gupta <[email protected]>, Partha 
Datta <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovs-ofctl: Implementation of eviction on the basis of 
Importance

On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 05:22:42PM +0530, Saloni Jain wrote:
> There have been some changes in the ovs-master code, so we have
> rebased our eviction patch in accordance to that.
> 
> Please find attached the updated patch for eviction feature, rebased
> with the latest ovs-master as on 26 Dec 2014.
> 
> Kindly review it and provide your inputs/comments if any.

Glancing through this, I see many places where the indentation is
grossly wrong.  Please fix it, and then I'll take another look.
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to