On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 04:31:34PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote:
> Executing clean-up commands in the reverse order of their addition
> seems to be better for most of the cleanup situations. For example,
> in kmod tests, we should remove name spaces before remove kernel
> modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com>
Not a bad idea!
> -m4_define([ON_EXIT], [trap '. ./cleanup' 0; cat >>cleanup <<'EOF'
> -$1
> -EOF
> +dnl The commands will be added will be tht first one to excute.
> +m4_define([ON_EXIT], [trap '. ./cleanup' 0; (echo '$1'; cat cleanup) >
> __cleanup; mv __cleanup cleanup
> ])
I'm nervous about abandoning the <<'EOF'. Any argument that contains a
single-quote will now cause problems. How about (untested):
cat - cleanup <<'EOF' >__cleanup
$1
EOF
mv __cleanup cleanup
instead?
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
