On 02/19/15 at 11:16am, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> diff --git a/ovn/ovn-nb.ovsschema b/ovn/ovn-nb.ovsschema
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4c29562
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/ovn/ovn-nb.ovsschema
The schema below has some whitespace / tab mixups.
[...]
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +{
> + "name": "OVN_Northbound",
> + "tables": {
> + "Logical_Switch": {
> + "columns": {
> + "external_ids": {
> + "type": {"key": "string", "value": "string",
> + "min": 0, "max": "unlimited"}}}},
> + "Logical_Port": {
> + "columns": {
> + "switch": {"type": {"key": {"type": "uuid",
> + "refTable": "Logical_Switch",
> + "refType": "strong"}}},
> + "router_port": {"type": {"key": {"type": "uuid",
> + "refTable":
> "Logical_Router_Port",
> + "refType": "strong"},
> + "min": 0,
> + "max": 1}},
What is the reason to hook the Logical_Router_Port to a Logical_Port
and not to the Logical_Switch directly? It seems like the port_security
does not apply to routers and the state should also be "up" at all
times.
[...]
> + <p>
> + Following are not well thought out:
> + </p>
> +
> + <dl>
> + <dt><code>learn</code></dt>
> +
> + <dt><code>conntrack</code></dt>
> +
> + <dt><code>with(<var>field</var>=<var>value</var>) {
> <var>action</var>, </code>...<code> }</code></dt>
> + <dd>execute <var>actions</var> with temporary changes to
> <var>fields</var></dd>
> +
> + <dt><code>dec_ttl { <var>action</var>, </code>...<code> } {
> <var>action</var>; </code>...<code>}</code></dt>
> + <dd>
> + decrement TTL; execute first set of actions if
> + successful, second set if TTL decrement fails
> + </dd>
> +
> + <dt><code>icmp_reply { <var>action</var>, </code>...<code>
> }</code></dt>
> + <dd>generate ICMP reply from packet, execute <var>action</var></dd>
Possible useful addition could be arp_respond to implement the L2 pop
of OpenStack.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
