> On Mar 27, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Russell Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > We've discussed wanting to have something to demo by the OpenStack > Summit in Vancouver (May 18-22), which I think is a fantastic goal. I > wanted to clarify the scope of this first target. > > So far in the work I've been doing, I've only been looking at the L2 > parts (logical switches and logical ports). What would you all think of > sticking with that for the first iteration? We can use the DHCP and L3 > agents from Neutron for now. > > I've done some looking at the L3 parts of the current design, and I > think there's some more needed. It would be nice to just make L2 work > and come back to it.
Yes, we're in complete agreement. This is what Ben and I had been planning. Thanks for bringing it up since it hadn't been properly conveyed before. Our current thinking is that we'll get L2 connectivity working for the demo with a stretch goal of hardware VTEP support. I haven't had a chance to think through the L3 implications yet, so I don't have much to add to the questions you've raised. I'll leave those to Ben in case he's given them any thought. Thanks, --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
