On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:12:12AM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: > > > > I think that the new version will force a reconfiguration for > > set_cfm(ofport, NULL) even if 'ofport' didn't have any CFM configured. > > That seems wrong to me. > > > > Thanks, this is a very good point, I think we should do it the same way as > set_bfd(), where we compare the old pointer and the new one, set the > need_revalidate when they are different, > > So, how about this~?
That's good, thanks. Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
