On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote:
> The userspace tunneling API for pushing and popping tunnel headers
> is currently based on processing batches of packets. However, there
> is no obvious way to take advantage of batching for these operations
> and so each tunnel operation has a pair of loops to process the
> batch. This changes the API to operate on single packets to enable
> better code reuse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com>
> ---
>  lib/netdev-provider.h |   9 ++--
>  lib/netdev-vport.c    | 140 
> +++++++++++---------------------------------------
>  lib/netdev.c          |  34 +++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-provider.h b/lib/netdev-provider.h
> index fabeb2d..a81f8f8 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-provider.h
> +++ b/lib/netdev-provider.h
> @@ -264,14 +264,13 @@ struct netdev_class {
>       * flow.  Push header is called for packet to build header specific to
>       * a packet on actual transmit.  It uses partial header build by
>       * build_header() which is passed as data. */
> -    int (*push_header)(const struct netdev *netdev,
> -                       struct dp_packet **buffers, int cnt,
> -                       const struct ovs_action_push_tnl *data);
> +    void (*push_header)(const struct netdev *netdev,
> +                        struct dp_packet *packet,
> +                        const struct ovs_action_push_tnl *data);
>

>      /* Pop tunnel header from packet, build tunnel metadata and resize packet
>       * for further processing. */
> -    int  (*pop_header)(struct netdev *netdev,
> -                       struct dp_packet **buffers, int cnt);
> +    int (*pop_header)(struct netdev *netdev, struct dp_packet *packet);
>

We can remove unused netdev parameter from push and pop calls.

Otherwise looks good.
Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to