This version of the patch breaks sparse, I sent out another. Ethan
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> wrote: > The MAX_PKT_BURST and NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH macros had a confusing > relationship. They basically purport to do the same thing, making it > unclear which is the source of truth. > > Furthermore, while NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH was 256, MAX_PKT_BURST was 32, > meaning we never process a batch larger than 32 packets further adding > to the confusion. > > This patch resolves the issue by removing MAX_PKT_BURST completely, > and shrinking the new NETDEV_MAX_BURST macro to only 32. This should > have no change in the execution path except shrinking a couple of > structs and memory allocations (can't hurt). > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> > --- > lib/dpif-netdev.c | 10 +++++----- > lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 7 ++----- > lib/netdev.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c > index f1d65f5..4216865 100644 > --- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c > +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c > @@ -2500,7 +2500,7 @@ dp_netdev_process_rxq_port(struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread > *pmd, > struct dp_netdev_port *port, > struct netdev_rxq *rxq) > { > - struct dp_packet *packets[NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH]; > + struct dp_packet *packets[NETDEV_MAX_BURST]; > int error, cnt; > > cycles_count_start(pmd); > @@ -3027,7 +3027,7 @@ struct packet_batch { > > struct dp_netdev_flow *flow; > > - struct dp_packet *packets[NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH]; > + struct dp_packet *packets[NETDEV_MAX_BURST]; > }; > > static inline void > @@ -3397,7 +3397,7 @@ dp_execute_cb(void *aux_, struct dp_packet **packets, > int cnt, > > case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_TUNNEL_PUSH: > if (*depth < MAX_RECIRC_DEPTH) { > - struct dp_packet *tnl_pkt[NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH]; > + struct dp_packet *tnl_pkt[NETDEV_MAX_BURST]; > int err; > > if (!may_steal) { > @@ -3423,7 +3423,7 @@ dp_execute_cb(void *aux_, struct dp_packet **packets, > int cnt, > > p = dp_netdev_lookup_port(dp, portno); > if (p) { > - struct dp_packet *tnl_pkt[NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH]; > + struct dp_packet *tnl_pkt[NETDEV_MAX_BURST]; > int err; > > if (!may_steal) { > @@ -3485,7 +3485,7 @@ dp_execute_cb(void *aux_, struct dp_packet **packets, > int cnt, > > case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC: > if (*depth < MAX_RECIRC_DEPTH) { > - struct dp_packet *recirc_pkts[NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH]; > + struct dp_packet *recirc_pkts[NETDEV_MAX_BURST]; > > if (!may_steal) { > dp_netdev_clone_pkt_batch(recirc_pkts, packets, cnt); > diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c > index 505ab75..b06f92a 100644 > --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c > +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c > @@ -99,8 +99,6 @@ BUILD_ASSERT_DECL((MAX_NB_MBUF / > ROUND_DOWN_POW2(MAX_NB_MBUF/MIN_NB_MBUF)) > #define TX_HTHRESH 0 /* Default values of TX host threshold reg. */ > #define TX_WTHRESH 0 /* Default values of TX write-back threshold reg. */ > > -#define MAX_PKT_BURST 32 /* Max burst size for RX/TX */ > - > /* Character device cuse_dev_name. */ > char *cuse_dev_name = NULL; > > @@ -862,7 +860,7 @@ netdev_dpdk_vhost_rxq_recv(struct netdev_rxq *rxq_, > nb_rx = rte_vhost_dequeue_burst(virtio_dev, qid, > vhost_dev->dpdk_mp->mp, > (struct rte_mbuf **)packets, > - MAX_PKT_BURST); > + NETDEV_MAX_BURST); > if (!nb_rx) { > return EAGAIN; > } > @@ -889,8 +887,7 @@ netdev_dpdk_rxq_recv(struct netdev_rxq *rxq_, struct > dp_packet **packets, > > nb_rx = rte_eth_rx_burst(rx->port_id, rxq_->queue_id, > (struct rte_mbuf **) packets, > - MIN((int) NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH, > - (int) MAX_PKT_BURST)); > + NETDEV_MAX_BURST); > if (!nb_rx) { > return EAGAIN; > } > diff --git a/lib/netdev.h b/lib/netdev.h > index 71c0af1..9d412ee 100644 > --- a/lib/netdev.h > +++ b/lib/netdev.h > @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ typedef void netdev_dump_queue_stats_cb(unsigned int > queue_id, > int netdev_dump_queue_stats(const struct netdev *, > netdev_dump_queue_stats_cb *, void *aux); > > -enum { NETDEV_MAX_RX_BATCH = 256 }; /* Maximum number packets in > rx_recv() batch. */ > +enum { NETDEV_MAX_BURST = 32 }; /* Maximum number packets in a batch. */ > extern struct seq *tnl_conf_seq; > > #ifdef __cplusplus > -- > 1.9.1 > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev