Hi Ben, Thanks, my query has been resolved and the code is updated in version 10 --"[PATCH v10] ovs-ofctl:Implementation of eviction on the basis of Importance" sent on 17-June-2015. Sending a new patch version 11, rebased with the latest master.
Thanks and Regards, Saloni Jain Tata Consultancy Services Mailto: saloni.j...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com ____________________________________________ Experience certainty. IT Services Business Solutions Consulting ____________________________________________ -----Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: ----- To: Saloni Jain <saloni.j...@tcs.com> From: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> Date: 06/22/2015 09:10PM Cc: dev@openvswitch.org, saloni.jai...@gmail.com, Deepankar Gupta <deepankar.gu...@tcs.com>, Partha Datta <partha.da...@tcs.com> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v9] ovs-ofctl:Implementation of eviction on the basis of Importance On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:44:37PM +0530, Saloni Jain wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for your inputs. We will share the updated patch. > Kindly suggest for the below point.. > > >This adds abstracted OFPUTIL_TABLE_CONFIG_* but it doesn't do any > >translation between them and OFPTC14_*. > > As per the openflow specs. 1.4, OFPTC14_* values are defined only for > eviction and vacancy events (as OFPTC14_EVICTION and OFPTC14_VACANCY_EVENTS), > but there is no OFPTC14_* value defined for "no-evict" feature. > Please suggest can we use OFPTC11_TABLE_MISS_* values for the same, as the > comment in the definition of ofp_table_config for OFPTC11_TABLE_MISS_* > values, in openflow-common.h suggest that > " /* OpenFlow 1.1 and 1.2 defined this field as shown. > * OpenFlow 1.3 and later mark this field as deprecated, but have not > * reused it for any new purpose. */" > > So when "no-evict" is set through mod-table command (for OF1.4 or greater) to > disable eviction , can any one of OFPTC11_TABLE_MISS_* values be used? I'm not sure I understand the question. OFPTC14_EVICTION enables eviction through OF1.4 mechanisms; if it is not set, then eviction is not enabled through OF1.4 mechanisms. What does the table miss setting to do with this? =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
