On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Jesse Gross <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Pravin B Shelar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: Joe Stringer <[email protected]>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <[email protected]>
>
> At a first glance, it looks like there are a few commits in 4.1 that
> aren't represented here:
> netlink: implement nla_put_in_addr and nla_put_in6_addr
> netlink: implement nla_get_in_addr and nla_get_in6_addr
> openvswitch: disable LRO
>
>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
>> index d14f786..f4b9188 100644
>> --- a/.travis.yml
>> +++ b/.travis.yml
>> @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ env:
>> - TESTSUITE=1 KERNEL=3.18.1
>> - TESTSUITE=1 OPTS="--enable-shared"
>> - BUILD_ENV="-m32" OPTS="--disable-ssl"
>> - - KERNEL=4.0.2
>> + - KERNEL=4.1.6
>> + - KERNEL=4.0.9
>
> Is there a reason to have both 4.0 and 4.1 tested?
>
right, I have removed it in next patch.
>> diff --git a/datapath/datapath.h b/datapath/datapath.h
>> index 526ddad..aca9407 100644
>> --- a/datapath/datapath.h
>> +++ b/datapath/datapath.h
>> static inline struct net *ovs_dp_get_net(const struct datapath *dp)
>> {
>> - return read_pnet(&dp->net);
>> + return rpl_read_pnet(&dp->net);
>> }
>>
>> static inline void ovs_dp_set_net(struct datapath *dp, struct net *net)
>> {
>> - write_pnet(&dp->net, net);
>> + rpl_write_pnet(&dp->net, net);
>> }
>
> Can we use macros here so we don't need to call the rpl_ versions directly?
If I use the macro then it causes compilation issue in older linux
header that calls write_pnet(),read_pnet() due to undefined struct
possible_net_t. I can move these definitions to compat.h file to make
it clear.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
