Hi, I have some initial questions in this design.
> On Sep 30, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > This is a proposed plan for logical L3 in OVN. It is not entirely > complete but it includes many important details and I believe that it moves > planning forward. > > +* L3 support > + > +** OVN_Northbound schema > + > +*** Needs to support interconnected routers > + > +It should be possible to connect one router to another, e.g. to > +represent a provider/tenant router relationship. This requires > +an OVN_Northbound schema change. It’s not obvious to me what the NB schema change involved here will be? Will the the router ports connecting 2 routers be treated as a special case? > + > +*** Needs to support extra routes > + > +Currently a router port has a single route associated with it, but > +presumably we should support multiple routes. For connections from > +one router to another, this doesn't seem to matter (just put more than > +one connection between them), but for connections between a router and > +a switch it might matter because a switch has only one router port. From an OpenStack integration point of view is this for supporting multiple subnets in a Logical Network? If so I would imagine this would involve a OVN_NB schema change for the Logical Router Port [each supporting multiple routes] or Logical Switches having a list of router ports. For e.g. let’s say say we have 2 subnets in one Logical Switch (LS1) and 1 subnet in another Logical Switch (LS2). This would requires 3 (or 2?) “logical patch” ports pairs in the OVN_SB schema below. Thanks Amitabha _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
