On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:03:16PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > Make miniflow_pad_to_64() a little more robust with regards to updates to > struct flow by passing the last field, whose end should be considered for > padding, rather than the next field, whose start should be considered. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com>
I asked Jarno to review this, but then he asked me right back. I've now read it and I like it very much. It makes it harder to write the wrong code, and I'm all in favor of that. I applied this to master. Thank you! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
