I think these options will apply only for the VIFs (logical_ports with
an empty 'type').
--
Babu
On Thursday 31 December 2015 04:34 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I was hoping to keep the options column for options that are specific
to a particular type of logical port. Do you think that the QoS
options will be type specific or generic?
On December 30, 2015 3:51:13 AM CST, Babu Shanmugam
<bscha...@redhat.com> wrote:
I am trying to implement the QOS APIs of openstack neutron in the
networking-ovn plugin. I understand that I have to make the relevant
changes in OVN code as well.
I feel, 'options' field in Logical_Port table would be a decent
candidate to bring QoS support in OVN [1]. I could see from the
description that there are no 'options' mentioned for a VIF. Is there
any other way we could implement it through the northbound database?
[1].
Sample options - qos_(ingress | egress)_rate, qos_(ingress |
egress)_burst, qos_dscp.
--
Babu
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
