Thanks. Would you mind testing this proposed fix?
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-January/064070.html
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:32:48AM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> These two tests generate the leak:
> mpls_xlate
> 381: MPLS xlate action
> ofproto-dpif
> 852: ofproto-dpif - MPLS handling
>
> ==65139== by 0x4E1C83: xmemdup (util.c:134)
> ==65139== by 0x431044: recirc_state_clone (ofproto-dpif-rid.c:221)
> ==65139== by 0x431044: recirc_alloc_id__ (ofproto-dpif-rid.c:238)
> ==65139== by 0x4315B8: recirc_alloc_id_ctx (ofproto-dpif-rid.c:281)
> ==65139== by 0x437C96: compose_recirculate_action__
> (ofproto-dpif-xlate.c:3643)
> ==65139== by 0x44095A: compose_recirculate_action
> (ofproto-dpif-xlate.c:3664)
> ==65139== by 0x44095A: xlate_actions (ofproto-dpif-xlate.c:5324)
>
> Regards,
> William
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
>
> > I think that recirc_run needs to be modified so that
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 06:40:23PM +0000, ChengChun Tu wrote:
> > > Hi Ben,
> > >
> > > Yes, Valgrind testcase 381 reports leak and generates the call stack
> > below:
> > > I tried to debug it for a while but not able to understand it.
> >
> > Thanks, what's the name of that test case? The one I see as 381 doesn't
> > seem relevant.
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > dev@openvswitch.org
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
