On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:18:02 +0000, Chandran, Sugesh wrote: > [Sugesh] As I mentioned in the earlier mail communication, How do we > specify the cases where the tunnel header data neither ipv6 nor ipv4. > (Say for eg: ETH-NSH.). Just wondering what to do for the cases where > the ETH/AF types are not defined/available. I am not sure about such a > specific usecase at the moment. If you feel that the ETH_TYPE can > handle all the cases, Will change accordingly.
We do have an ethertype for NSH (0x894F). I agree with Cascardo that AF_ or ETH_TYPE_ would be better; AF_ does not cover all cases, though. ETH_TYPE_ should cover everything - after all, we need to be able to send the encapsulated packets out. Jiri -- Jiri Benc _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
