Panu Matilainen <pmati...@redhat.com> writes:
> Requires DPDK >= 2.2 as that is the first version to have a standard
> install layout which we can discover without help from user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Panu Matilainen <pmati...@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> As a follow-up to this discussion (oh my, where did the time go...):
> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-November/062599.html
>
> RFC only for now since rest of OVS hasn't been update for DPDK 2.2
> yet.
I think the approach is good, just a minor comment below.
> rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in b/rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in
> index 15f5c60..1bf4c12 100644
> --- a/rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in
> +++ b/rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
> # If libcap-ng isn't available and there is no need for running OVS
> # as regular user, specify the '--without libcapng'
> %bcond_without libcapng
> +# To enable DPDK support, specify '--with dpdk' when building
> +%bcond_with dpdk
>
> # Enable PIE, bz#955181
> %global _hardened_build 1
> @@ -49,6 +51,10 @@ BuildRequires: procps-ng
> %if %{with libcapng}
> BuildRequires: libcap-ng libcap-ng-devel
> %endif
> +%if %{with dpdk}
> +BuildRequires: dpdk-devel >= 2.2.0
> +Provides: %{name}-dpdk = %{version}-%{release}
> +%endif
>
> Requires: openssl iproute module-init-tools
> #Upstream kernel commit 4f647e0a3c37b8d5086214128614a136064110c3
> @@ -117,6 +123,9 @@ overlays and security groups.
> %else
> --disable-libcapng \
> %endif
> +%if %{with dpdk}
> + --with-dpdk=$(dirname %{_datadir}/dpdk/*/.config) \
> +%endif
dpdk-devel forces export of RTE_SDK - should that change from
${_datadir}/dpdk/*/.config
to
$(RTE_SDK)/*/.config ?
Also, not sure about the '*' - might be better to try and figure out the
config name somehow?
> --enable-ssl \
> --with-pkidir=%{_sharedstatedir}/openvswitch/pki
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
