On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:44:20PM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 06:38 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > This was more or less implemented inside lflow.c until now, but some
> > upcoming code that shouldn't be in that file needs to use it too.
> >
> > This also adds a second index on lports, so that lports can be looked up
> > based on the logical datapath tunnel key and the logical port tunnel key.
> > An upcoming commit will add a user for this new index.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
...
> > +static bool
> > +lookup_port_cb(const void *aux_, const char *port_name, unsigned int
> > *portp)
> > {
> > - struct logical_datapath *ldp;
> > - HMAP_FOR_EACH (ldp, hmap_node, &logical_datapaths) {
> > - simap_clear(&ldp->ports);
> > - }
> > -
> > - const struct sbrec_port_binding *binding;
> > - SBREC_PORT_BINDING_FOR_EACH (binding, ctx->ovnsb_idl) {
> > - struct logical_datapath *ldp =
> > ldp_lookup_or_create(binding->datapath);
> > + const struct lookup_port_aux *aux = aux_;
> >
> > - simap_put(&ldp->ports, binding->logical_port, binding->tunnel_key);
> > + const struct sbrec_port_binding *pb
> > + = lport_lookup_by_name(aux->lports, port_name);
> > + if (pb && pb->datapath == aux->dp) {
> > + *portp = pb->tunnel_key;
> > + return true;
> > }
> >
> > - const struct sbrec_multicast_group *mc;
> > - SBREC_MULTICAST_GROUP_FOR_EACH (mc, ctx->ovnsb_idl) {
> > - struct logical_datapath *ldp = ldp_lookup_or_create(mc->datapath);
> > - simap_put(&ldp->ports, mc->name, mc->tunnel_key);
> > + const struct sbrec_multicast_group *mg
> > + = mcgroup_lookup_by_dp_name(aux->mcgroups, aux->dp, port_name);
> > + if (mg) {
> > + *portp = mg->tunnel_key;
> > + return true;
> > }
> >
> > - struct logical_datapath *next_ldp;
> > - HMAP_FOR_EACH_SAFE (ldp, next_ldp, hmap_node, &logical_datapaths) {
> > - if (simap_is_empty(&ldp->ports)) {
> > - ldp_free(ldp);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -}
> > + VLOG_WARN("unknown lport name %s", port_name);
> >
> I am seeing a lot of this warning log print because 'inport = \"\"' for the
> logical flows pertaining to "ARP reply for known IPs".
> May be this warning print can be removed.
Fair enough. Removed. Thank you for the review.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
