Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote on 02/05/2016 01:01:56 PM:

> From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Date: 02/05/2016 01:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] [ovn-controller] [RFC] Poor man's
> lflow incremental processing
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 04:20:23PM -0600, RYAN D. MOATS wrote:
> > Add incremental processing of lflows in ovn-controller by
> > taking the simple approach of marking each lflow dirty when
> > touched and have lflow_run only process dirty flows.
> >
> > This needs unit test code before the RFC tag comes off.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: RYAN D. MOATS <rmo...@us.ibm.com>
>
> I was envisioning something that would incrementally determine on a
> per-flow basis whether anything needed to be recalculated.  Starting
> with a per-logical-datapath approach, as this patch does, is a nice
> place to start because it is presumably easier, so I think it's a good
> idea.

I suspect we'll get to that point eventually, but I figured this would be
easier to start with...

> I don't understand how this particular patch is going to make a
> difference, though, since ldp_run() appears to always dirty every
> logical datapath.

Well, when I ran the test that I used on Russell's now merged patch that
improved things 15%, I was still seeing that each lflow_run call would
process
36020 logical datapaths, 40012 matches and take a little more than half a
second to complete

Running that same test on this patch resulted in (after completion)
only 2797 of the 36020 logical datapaths being processed - these generated
2934 matches being reprogrammed and a lflow_run call would complete in less
than 50 msec.

>
> I don't know why this deletes a comment that seems to be orthogonal to
> the purpose of the patch.

Honestly, that's my mistake and I'll fix it when I fix the below...

> Please use "bool", "true", and "false" for Boolean values, instead of
> uint8_t, 1, and 0.

Ack.

Ryan
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to