From: David Wragg <david@weave.works> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:54:14 +0000
> Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com> writes: >> Please implement like in ip_tunnel_change_mtu (or better yet call it), >> that is the precedent for tunnels. > > I've made geneve_change_mtu follow ip_tunnel_change_mtu in v2. > > If it were to call it instead, are you suggesting just passing in > t_hlen? Or restructuring geneve.c to re-use the whole ip_tunnel > infrastructure? > > Also, I'm not sure where the 0xFFF8 comes from in > __ip_tunnel_change_mtu. Any ideas why 0xFFF8 rather than 0xffff? It > goes all the way back to the inital import of the kernel into git. Some 8 byte multiple requirement, perhaps to do with fragmentation. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
