On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Russell Bryant <russ...@ovn.org> wrote: >>> > - Each <code>localnet</code> logical port is implemented as a >>> pair of >>> > - patch ports, one in the integration bridge, one in a >>> different >>> > - bridge, with the same >>> <code>external-ids:ovn-localnet-port</code> >>> > - value. >>> > + Each <code>localnet</code> and <code>gateway</code> logical >>> port >>> > + is implemented as a pair of patch ports, one in the >>> integration >>> > + bridge, one in a different bridge, with the same >>> > + <code>external-ids:ovn-localnet-port</code> value. >>> >>> Is this ovn-localnet-port a typo? >>> >> >> No. It's still using the same external-id value. I did that because >> "gateway" ports share almost all of the code for localnet ports, so it was >> just convenient. >> >> I thought about changing the name to avoid confusion, but hadn't decided >> on exactly what to change yet. >> >> I think it would worth a small code change in patch.c so that they use > different names to avoid confusion. >
Sounds good. It'll need some changes in physical.c, as well, I believe. I'll work on it. Thanks, -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
