On 14/04/2016 05:37, "Kavanagh, Mark B" <mark.b.kavan...@intel.com> wrote:
>Hi Daniele, > >One comment inline. > >Thanks, >Mark > >> >>This introduces in dpif-netdev and netdev-dpdk the first use for the >>newly introduce reconfigure netdev call. >> >>When a request to change the number of queues comes, netdev-dpdk will >>remember this and notify the upper layer via >>netdev_request_reconfigure(). >> >>The datapath, instead of periodically calling netdev_set_multiq(), can >>detect this and call reconfigure(). >> >>This mechanism can also be used to: >>* Automatically match the number of rxq with the one provided by qemu >> via the new_device callback. >>* Provide a way to change the MTU of dpdk devices at runtime. >>* Move a DPDK vhost device to the proper NUMA socket. >> >>Signed-off-by: Daniele Di Proietto <diproiet...@vmware.com> >>--- >> lib/dpif-netdev.c | 69 +++++++++--------- >> lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 195 >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ >> lib/netdev-provider.h | 23 +++--- >> lib/netdev.c | 34 +++------ >> lib/netdev.h | 3 +- >> 5 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-) [...] >>@@ -312,12 +305,12 @@ struct netdev_class { >> * making sure that these concurrent calls do not create a race >>condition >> * by using multiple hw queues or locking. >> * >>- * On error, the tx queue and rx queue configuration is >>indeterminant. >>- * Caller should make decision on whether to restore the previous or >>- * the default configuration. Also, caller must make sure there is >>no >>- * other thread accessing the queues at the same time. */ >>- int (*set_multiq)(struct netdev *netdev, unsigned int n_txq, >>- unsigned int n_rxq); >>+ * The caller will call netdev_reconfigure() (if necessary) before >>using >>+ * netdev_send() on any of the newly configured queues, giving the >>provider >>+ * a chance to adjust its settings. >>+ * >>+ * On error, the tx queue configuration is unchanged. */ >>+ int (*set_multiq)(struct netdev *netdev, unsigned int n_txq); > >Since this function now deals only with TX queues, an identifier along >the lines of 'set_tx_multiq' might more accurately describe its >functionality. Specific netdev classes would need to modify the names of >their own specific 'set_multiq' functions accordingly. You're right, 'set_tx_multiq()' is definitely a better name for it. I updated it. Thanks for all your feedback _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev