On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:06:47PM -0700, William Tu wrote: > > I'm not sure why CHECK_TRUNC_USERSPACE exists, because I think that your > > patch implements the new action in userspace. > > When translating sflow header config, only if it runs kernel datapath, > I will program truncate to sample's actions list, ex: > "sample(trunc(64), userspace(...))". If it runs userspace datapath, > then it falls back to original way "sample(userspace(...))" and let > sflow code cut the packet to 'header' size.
Why are the two datapaths treated differently? Software is easier to test if all the cases are similar, when possible. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
