I think it is clearer with the "not". I don't know what it means without that word.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:00:55PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote: > Sorry, I think I just realized that the "not" here is optional in English. > But it did take me sometime to figure out :( > > Han > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Han Zhou <zhou...@gmail.com> > > --- > > FAQ.md | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/FAQ.md b/FAQ.md > > index df6f225..cc4fdf6 100644 > > --- a/FAQ.md > > +++ b/FAQ.md > > @@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ A: Yes. For traffic that egresses from a switch, > > OVS supports traffic > > > > Keep in mind that ingress and egress are from the perspective of the > > switch. That means that egress shaping limits the rate at which > > - traffic is allowed to transmit from a physical interface, but the > > + traffic is allowed to transmit from a physical interface, but not the > > rate at which traffic will be received on a virtual machine's VIF. > > For ingress policing, the behavior is the opposite. > > > > -- > > 2.1.0 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
