FYI
> -----Mesaj original----- > De la: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org] > Trimis: Friday, July 29, 2016 11:53 PM > Către: Alin Serdean <aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com> > Cc: Guru Shetty <g...@ovn.org>; Sairam Venugopal > <vsai...@vmware.com>; Nithin Raju <nit...@vmware.com>; Justin Pettit > <jpet...@ovn.org>; Alessandro Pilotti <apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com> > Subiect: Re: OVS branching 2.6 > > Sure, thanks. > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 08:35:25PM +0000, Alin Serdean wrote: > > +Nithin, +Sairam > > > > Thank you for understanding. > > > > @Ben, should I forward the email to ovs-dev? > > > > Alin. > > > > > -----Mesaj original----- > > > De la: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org] > > > Trimis: Friday, July 29, 2016 7:39 AM > > > Către: Guru Shetty <g...@ovn.org> > > > Cc: Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org>; Alin Serdean > > > <aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com>; Alessandro Pilotti > > > <apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com> > > > Subiect: Re: OVS branching 2.6 > > > > > > I agree. > > > > > > (I also think this should have been on ovs-dev; it's not really fair > > > to everyone to keep decisions like this hidden.) > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 09:09:39PM -0700, Guru Shetty wrote: > > > > I think local named pipes should go into 2.6 (as long as it does > > > > not introduce regression into unit tests). Python series should > > > > also go (I haven't looked at all the patches yet, as long as there > > > > are no high risk non-Windows changes). The internal ports series > > > > would depend on the quality of reviews. If someone from VMware > > > > Windows team takes a close look at the patch series (no hurried > > > > reviews and revisions), I don't see why it shouldn't make it to 2.6. > > > > > > > > On 28 July 2016 at 17:50, Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > +Guru > > > > > > > > > > --Justin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Alin Serdean < > > > > > aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to raise awareness about two patches which seem they > > > > > > will not be > > > > > integrated before 1 August: > > > > > > - local named pipe instead of TCP port in a file (security concern): > > > > > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-July/076306.html > > > > > > - Multiple internal / external port support in OVS on > > > > > > Windows(this > > > > > allows us to get into other features i.e. bonding): > > > > > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-July/076238.html > > > > > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-July/076241.html > > > > > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-July/076239.html > > > > > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-July/076240.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Another patch set that would a good addition for 2.6 as well is: > > > > > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-July/076194.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we make an exception for the above if they do not get > > > > > > integrated > > > > > before 1 August? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Alin. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
