On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > > > >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for it being > >> considered a set of fixes ... > > > > I agree - it straddles a line. I was hesitant to even ask, but in RHEL > > we probably need to backport these anyway, so I made an assumption > > (maybe poor) that other systemd distros might use the rhel scripts and > > run into this class of issues also. Good net-izen, and all that :) > > > > -Aaron > > Hi Aaron, > > Thanks for the backport request. I am also interested in these fixes and > it's something I could use in the SUSE package as well. For my point of > view I see no blockers for those updating their 2.5.0 installations with > these fixes in but I will do some testing on my end as well.
I don't know whether we came to a conclusion on this or whether the discussion just dropped. Is it still desirable? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
