hmm, I think the behaviour is not really well defined. So we should not really test it.
LieGrue, strub --- Eric Covener <[email protected]> schrieb am Di, 9.2.2010: > Von: Eric Covener <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: interceptors in constructors > An: [email protected] > Datum: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010, 20:06 > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Mark > Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > yes, completely agree. Thus I marked our > CallingBusinessInConstructorTest with @Ignore. If other also > think that this should not be allowed (or at least it > doesn't have to be supported) - then I'd say we remove this > test completely. > > Or invert the assertion? > > -- > Eric Covener > [email protected] > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com
