Perhaps you guys should check out Commons Proxy's code?

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think the javassist ProxyFactory is simply not made for us.
> From the JavaDoc:
>
>> setHandler
>>
>> public void setHandler(MethodHandler mi)
>>    Sets the default invocation handler. This invocation handler is shared
>> among all the instances of a proxy class unless another is explicitly
>> specified.
>
> Which means that we cannot store _anything_ in a javassist ProxyHandler :(
>
> What I remember from java.lang.reflec.ProxyHandler is that this is possible.
> That's what I also find backed in the JavaDoc:
>
>> Each proxy instance has an associated invocation handler. When a method
>> is invoked on a proxy instance, the method invocation is encoded and
>> dispatched to the invoke  method of its invocation handler.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz 
> gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Reply via email to