[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12838322#action_12838322
]
Ceki Gulcu commented on OWB-300:
--------------------------------
If every framework had its own logging abstraction, the user would need to deal
with each separately wasting time and energy.
> Currently OWB requires log4j for logging. This patch provides a means of
> choosing other loggers.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OWB-300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-300
> Project: OpenWebBeans
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: M4
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Paul J. Reder
> Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: M4
>
> Attachments: OWBLoggerOnly.patch
>
>
> Currently OWB requires (is dependent on) log4j for logging. This patch
> provides a means of choosing other loggers (thus reducing the number of
> dependencies but allowing flexibility). Notably, the patch switches the
> logging code to using the JDK java util logging (which is already available
> for other reasons). The patch includes comments to show how to maintain log4j
> use or use it as a model to enable other logging libs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
