> } else if (!parameterType.isInstance(parameter)) {
> throw new IllegalArgumentException("Expected parameter " + i +
> " to be of type " + parameterType.getName() +
> ", but got a parameter of type " +
> parameter.getClass().getName());
> }
David,
Thanks for the update. The TCK is expecting to replace the a
primitive parameter with the corresponding wrapped type with a call to
InvocationContext.setParameters(), which fails this test:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Expected parameter 0 to be of
type int, but got a parameter of type java.lang.Integer
Do you think such a thing should be tolerated, or do you think the
exception is more desirable here?
--
Eric Covener
[email protected]
