You are perfectly right!
________________________________ From: Joseph Bergmark <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, May 14, 2010 4:21:21 PM Subject: Re: tck artifacts not resolving? Specifically about 1.0.x vs 1.1.x, I think 1.0.X is the version that needs to be passed to be considered compliant right? 1.1.X is the stream they are adding new test cases to as they go. Sincerely, Joe On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but in this case we must not include those versions in our pom. > > Basically our project should be compilable with > > mvn clean install > > without any tweaking. Instead we should keep our webbeans-porting on the > latest _released_ version and please update your pom.xml locally. > > In addition 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT is an old version of the TCK. The latest version > is 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT afaik. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > --- On Fri, 5/14/10, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: tck artifacts not resolving? > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Friday, May 14, 2010, 12:19 PM > > Hello, > > > > I have manually download and install from > http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/weld/cdi-tck/branches/1.0 > > > > Thanks; > > > > > > --Gurkan > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Fri, May 14, 2010 3:13:50 PM > > Subject: tck artifacts not resolving? > > > > My sandbox is unable to find > > org.jboss.jsr299.tck:jsr299-tck-api:jar:1.0.2-SNAPSHOT > > > > I manually poked around jboss'es repository and only saw > > what looked > > like very old TCK artifacts. I mostly bluff my way > > through maven, but > > is -porting building for anyone else? > > > > > > -- > > Eric Covener > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >
