+1 i would like to commit at least the current version of OWB-407 (if there are no objections).
regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/8/10 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Thanks Eric, but please make this available as alternate implementation > only. > Because I honestly think the BDA definition is utterly broken in the spec > (*)! > It makes assumptions about classloading mechanisms which are _most_ times > true > for _old_ EE containers but is a) NOT defined in the EE spec and b) is NOT > true > for modern EE containers anymore (which heavily use OSGi under the hood). > > I honestly believe that the mechanisms we have currently does suite > professional > needs much better than this overly strict BDA stuff does. And we _still_ > pass > the TCK, so there is imo nothing to worry yet! > > LieGrue, > strub > > (*) marking a JAR (if available) as containing jars is really fine. And > with > Pete having added CDATA sections to the schema recently, we could now also > add > our own namespaced exclude and include rules to beans.xml for speeding up > the > classpath scanning. This is really neat. > BUT there are a few heavily broken thinkgs in the BDA part of the spec. A > few > examples: > > .) having to write <alternatives> into EACH BDA where it should be active > is > just idiotic > .) same for <interceptors> > .) same for <decorators> > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tue, August 10, 2010 3:56:29 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] releasing owb-1.0.0 next week? > > > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > > > Gurkan and I had a small chat yesterday about the stability of > OpenWebBeans. > >And > > > we both agree that it really would deserve a 1.0.0 number because it's > >pretty > > > stable. At least a lot more stable than many commercial products with > a 1.0 > > > release number ;) > > > > +1, I hope to work on BDA awareness in the scanner service / > > {Bean,Alternatives,Interceptor}Manager stuff and I don't want to > > derail 1.0 with it! > > > > Would we branch at 1.0, and would 1.0 still be CTR? > > > > > > -- > > Eric Covener > > [email protected] > > > > > >
