Is that CDITCK-137, or both 137 and 138? Sincerely,
Joe On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: > > FYI: > > Issue will be resolved by Red Hat at the next version of TCK. > > > --Gurkan > > > ________________________________ > From: Joseph Bergmark <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, August 31, 2010 5:42:17 PM > Subject: Re: CDI TCK Issues > > I agree with you. The spec doesn't seem to provide any requirement > that decorators should be injected directly into a) The injection > point of the Decorated bean or b) each other. > > I guess I'm sure sure how you can validate a TCK test with "secondary > evidence" and the intentions of the EG. It seems to me that it needs > to verify something that is clearly spelled out in the spec. > > I think the quote Eric pointed out certainly leaves some room for > implementation choices. > > Sincerely, > > Joe > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Seems that RedHat rejects TCK challaenge that I did open. Rejection comment > > is > > given at https://jira.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-137 > > > > Joe, how could we go with this ? WDYT? > > > > Thanks; > > > > --Gurkan > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Eric Covener <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Sun, August 29, 2010 3:42:12 PM > > Subject: Re: CDI TCK Issues > > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > >wrote: > >> Hello; > >> > >> We had problems with CDI-TCK 137 and CDI-TCK 138. I have put those issues > into > >> table but not responded so far. > >> > >> Please have a look and tell WDYT? > >> > >> https://jira.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-137 > >> https://jira.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-138 > > > > The tests don't seem to relate to any requirement in the spec. IMO the > > spec even alludes to the idea that the delegate injection points may > > not be the next member of the chain: > > > > "The delegate object implements the delegate type and delegates method > > invocations to remaining uninvoked decorators and eventually to the > > bean" > > > > > > -- > > Eric Covener > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >
