[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921206#action_12921206
]
Jacquelle Leggett commented on OWB-472:
---------------------------------------
I think some aspects of this issue can be considered a bug and other parts
represent a non-default implementation. As mentioned in the description, most
of us agree that not being able to define the same interceptor in multiple jars
of a .war is a bug.
I understand your point (Mark) about having to repackage a jar. In such a
case, the user would simply use the default OWB behavior.
If a war contains utility.jar with numerous common classes (some of which are
not well-known) and app1classes.jar with application-specific logic, then
there should be a way to only enable the modifiers (interceptors, decorators, &
alternatives) in app1classes.jar. In this case, a property would be set to
enable the archive centric beans.xml solution.
> archive centric beans.xml enabling
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: OWB-472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472
> Project: OpenWebBeans
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Injection and Lookup
> Reporter: Jacquelle Leggett
> Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu
> Original Estimate: 336h
> Remaining Estimate: 336h
>
> This issue was discussed in great detail in June
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openwebbeans-dev/201006.mbox/browser)
> on the developers forum. The title of the thread is "problems with lack of
> archive-centric BeanManager".
> The main problem is described below (snippet from discussion):
> "...Our current design does not permit either of the following scenarions,
> AFAICT:
> b.jar and c.jar both enable the interceptor defined in a.jar
> (treated as a duplicate)
> Exactly one of b.jar and c.jar enables the interceptor defined in
> a.jar (ends up enabled for beans from either archive if enabled in one
> -- this is in the more troubling neighborhood)..."
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
