> I'm not understanding what you are saying. Surely it is less work to replace > javassist than put an spi layer between OWB and javasisst. Are you saying > that if I say tomorrow removed javassist in favor of proxy creation that did > not require exposing server classes to applications that would not be > acceptable for the next OWB release? If so, why?
I don't see any sense in ripping it out without taking the time to wrap it in an SPI, so people impacted negatively by the alternative have some recourse. -- Eric Covener [email protected]
