furthermore, special settings won't make sense. imo the benchmark is ok and
we really have to find the issue(s).

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2011/2/24 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>

> nah, I also redirected it to a file and the output is not that extreme. I
> work with INFO level and the log output is the same as in 1.0.0.
> This cannot explain that owb-1.0.0 is five times faster...
>
> Will do a few parallel unit tests tonight.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Thu, 2/24/11, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: David Blevins <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: heavy performance decrease in 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Thursday, February 24, 2011, 6:02 PM
> >
> > On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> > > oh yes, and I experience some 'stuttering'. Means the
> > log scrolls, then it freezes for a second, logs again,
> > freezes, etc...
> >
> > You mean log as in log files?   Definitely
> > disable logging when doing any performance testing or you're
> > really just measuring your disk.  Improved logging
> > could easily explain that sharp decrease.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > >
> > > --- On Thu, 2/24/11, David Blevins <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: David Blevins <[email protected]>
> > >> Subject: Re: heavy performance decrease in
> > 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Date: Thursday, February 24, 2011, 4:50 PM
> > >>
> > >> On Feb 24, 2011, at 8:32 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> hi folks!
> > >>>
> > >>> Today I did run a few jmeter tests and it
> > seems that
> > >> we have some serious bottle neck in our code
> > currently. The
> > >> app just doesn't really scale well anymore and
> > performance
> > >> is down to 20% compared to 1.0.0 ...
> > >>
> > >> What aspects were you measuring and how?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to