Of course, cdi-1.1 changes which requires a jcdi-spec.jar change will _not_ go into owb-1.1.x Those will require a new branch for owb-1.2.0
What I was saying is that it's imo a bit too early to start working on it. I guess this will get a hot topic in march or so. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 4:14 PM > Subject: Yan: 1.2 Branch > > > > Hi Mark > > CDI 1.1 adds new functions and introduces new APIs. We can not add these to > OWB > 1.1.x, therefore we have to branch if we want to implement these features. > > > OK for just updating OWB-1.1.x codebase for some simple clarifications but > not > for new functionalites.We can add mature CDI 1.1 spec items (hardly to > change) > to OWB 1.2. > > > Gurkan > > > > ________________________________ > Kimden: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Kime: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Gönderildiği Tarih: 4 Aralık 2011 16:15 Pazar > Konu: Re: 1.2 Branch > > Hi Gurkan! > > I'm on the EG and we are still heavily changing the draft! > We even already reverted/changed a lot stuff which made it into the EDR after > reviewing the pieces. > > Imo it's still too early to adopt it. > > As I already wrote 3 months ago, I'm already in the process of incorporating > 1.0 API compatible clarifications and changes into owb-1.1.x > > Actually owb already contains a hell lot of that stuff! > > Also there is atm not really much I desperately miss in 1.0 from the 1.1 > spec. > Most of the work currently done have been clarifications! > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2011 3:05 PM >> Subject: 1.2 Branch >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I think that time has arrived to create 1.2 branch. 1.2 branch will > implement >> CDI 1.1 specification that EDR has already been published. >> >> >> Gurkan >> >
