+1 regards, gerhard
2012/3/21 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > +1 > > IMHO openejb/tomee will be more maintained than webbeans-openejb. > > - Romain > > > 2012/3/21 Rohit Kelapure <[email protected]> > > > agreed. For reference implementations we can point to OpenEJB or TomEE. > > > > --cheers, > > Rohit > > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > webbeans-openejb is legacy code afaik. > > > > > > > > > OpenEJB is using a codebase which was originally copied over and is > > > already heavily extended. > > > > > > It also makes much more sense to implement those parts over at OpenEJB > > imo. > > > > > > Thus I'd like to remove the webbeans-openejb module from OWB. > > > > > > Please speak out if you are still using it. Otherwise I gonna kill the > > > kitty tomorrow evening ;) > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > >
