No idea, was on the list then i sent another mail on the list before fixing to see if we could make it easier but got no answers IIRC Le 22 sept. 2012 23:20, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> which jira is this? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > >To: Mark Struberg <[email protected]>; [email protected] > >Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 11:06 PM > >Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.1.6 > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-tomcat7/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/web/tomcat/TomcatUtil.javahas > not been fixed right? Do we want it in this release? > >Le 22 sept. 2012 22:49, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >>I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.1.6 . > >> > >>This is a bugfix release of OpenWebBeans-1.1.x, thus no branch has been > created. It mainly contains compatibility/portability/performance > improvements and small bugfixes. > >> > >>The ReleaseNotes are available online: > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12322963 > >> > >> > >>Maven staging repo: > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-022/ > >> > >> > >>SVN source tag (r1388888): > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.1.6/ > >> > >> > >>Source release: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-022/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.1.6/openwebbeans-1.1.6-source-release.zip > >> > >> > >>Binary release: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-022/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.1.6/openwebbeans-distribution-1.1.6-binary.tar.gz > >> > >> > >>PGP release key 2FDB81B1 > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS > >> > >> > >>The VOTE will be open for 72 hours. > >> > >>[ ] +1 approve > >>[ ] +0 no opinion > >>[ ] -1 veto (and reason why) > >> > >>LieGrue, > >>strub > >> > >> > > > > >
