Should a 1.1 but we already have it so 1.2 is very good Le 25 nov. 2012 23:38, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> CDI-1.1 is only a bugfix release of the spec. Mostly clarifications ad > minor improvements. > So I think 1.2.x will do fine. > > > > The reason is that I personally dont have time to do 3 branches. So keep > SPI compat and CDI-1.0 in 1.1.x and do CDI-1.1 in owb-1.2.x. > CDI-1.1 is really just around the corner. And we would loose lots of > momentum if we do an intermediate step. > Also most of the stuff like HierarchicBeanManager will only get clarified > in CDI-1.1. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > >________________________________ > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 11:07 PM > >Subject: Re: heavy cleanup > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >does the lifting prepare the CDI 1.1? > >Or do we also want CDI 1.1 developments in? > > > > > >I mean, does CDI 1.1 require a 1.2, 1.5 or 2.0? > > > > > >Not sure it needs a 2.0, but maybe a real jump in versions would be great. > >Thoughts? > > > > > > > >2012/11/25 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > >good idea, I'll go update trunk. > >> > >>Please note that this does _not_ change anything for the 1.1.x branch! > >> > >>I'll do all this heavy lifting purely in trunk (1.2.x) > >> > >>LieGrue, > >>strub > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Cc: > >>> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 8:52 PM > >>> Subject: Re: heavy cleanup > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Will we also target java 1.6 ? > >>> > >>> 2012/11/25 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> All can be done independently now normally > >>>> Le 25 nov. 2012 20:37, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> > >>> a écrit : > >>>> > >>>> > I again found a heavy bug which is caused by things like > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > //X TODO this MUST NOT be public! > >>>> > public static > >>> ThreadLocal<List<DependentCreationalContext<Object>>> > >>>> > dependentInstanceOfProducerMethods = > >>>> > new > >>> ThreadLocal<List<DependentCreationalContext<Object>>>(); > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > Such code is pure PITA! > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > I'm really tempted to do a heavy cleanup in 1.2.0 (trunk) and go > >>> for > >>>> > CDI-1.1 directly. The spec is good enough to give a rough direction > >>> atm > >>>> and > >>>> > we really need to cleanup tons of things! > >>>> > > >>>> > LieGrue, > >>>> > strub > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Jean-Louis > > > > > > >
