Hi Mark 1.1.8 branch
Broken means that it is not necessary to pass this in TCK for CDI 1.0, why this test exist in TCK? Thks. Gurkan ________________________________ Kimden: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> Kime: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Gönderildiği Tarih: 9 Nis 2013 21:47 Salı Konu: Re: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies because it's broken! It's broken in the CDI-1.0 spec and we clarified the correct behaviour in CDI-1.1. Btw, which branch do you speak of? LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > To: openwebbeans-dev <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 11:17 AM > Subject: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies > > Hi > > In AbstractProducerBean below method is commented out but TCK 1.0 still > checks > ProducerMethod's Serializable return type and fields. > > public void validatePassivationDependencies() > { > // don't call super.validatePassivationDependencies()! > // the injection points of producers are the parameters of the > producermethod. > // since CDI-1.1 we must not check those for is serializable anymore. > } > > > In CDI 1.1 this is corrected but TCK 1.0 still check this. Why is this > commented > out? > > > Gurkan >
